President Asif Zardari hits back at US criticism of Pakistan


Pakistan President Asif Zardari has hit back at American criticism of his country's failure to catch terrorist leaders with an accusation that it was the US which created al-Qaeda and the Taliban. 

Mr Zardari, writing in the New York Times, was reacting to criticism from American officials, including defence secretary Robert Gates and senior military chiefs.
They have publicly criticised Pakistan's failure to target al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders who use the country's tribal areas as a base to attack Nato troops in Afghanistan.
Mr Zardari said Pakistanis were suspicious because of America's support for Islamic militants during the war against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan and its support for military dictators such as General Zia and General Musharraf.
Despite Pakistan Army offensives against Taliban strongholds in Swat Valley and South Waziristan, American officials believe Islamabad is reluctant to target Taliban leaders like Mullah Omar and Jalaluddin Haqqani because they are long-standing allies.
His people also believed the United States favours its rival India and called for Washington to put pressure on New Delhi to open new talks on the future of Kashmir.
"Twice in recent history America abandoned its democratic values to support dictators and manipulate and exploit us," he said.
"In the 1980s, the United States supported Gen Muhammad Zia ul-Haq's iron rule against the Pakistani people while using Pakistan as a surrogate in the war against the Soviets in Afghanistan.
"That decade turned our peaceful nation into a 'Kalashnikov and heroin' society a nation defined by guns and drugs. In its fight against the Soviets, the US supported the most radical elements within the mujahedeen, who would later become the Taliban and al-Qaeda.
"When the Soviets were defeated and left in 1989, the US abandoned Pakistan and created a vacuum in Afghanistan, resulting in the current horror. And then after 9/11, the United States closed its eyes to the abuses of the dictatorship of President Musharraf. For Pakistanis, it is a bitter memory," he wrote.
He justified Pakistan's anxiety over its relations with India and warned there will be no peace in the region "without addressing Kashmir." Pakistan's best hope of defeating terrorism and fanaticism lies in developing its economy and strengthening its democracy, he said. ______  Dean Nelson, South Asia Editor , Dec 11, 2009

My Comments on article
Mr. Zardari Pakistan President  talk on the facts of 1989 that releave the weakness in US policies during that decade. During 1989 US leaves the Afghanistan after wining the Soviet war leave a great vacuum for a militant nation who serve a decade in war against a world power. Afghanistan that time loss every thing no economical values was present in country. Peoples of the Nation mostly youngsters  were disable due injuries in war or became  refuge in Pakistan, So, the source of economics and the pillar of nation, the youngsters were complete finished mentaly and physicaly. At that time of poverty some radicals stand in different tribes of Afghanistan and start against each other due to psychological claims. I think, these psychological claiming leads a militant nation to tribal war which were the drawbacks of US escaping without doing any development

If US army leaves Afghanistan or Iraq then same sititution  rise again in both countries... So, at this US army instead fighting make some development in both countries

 

Pakistan President Asif Zardari has hit back at American criticism of his country's failure to catch terrorist leaders with an accusation that it was the US which created al-Qaeda and the Taliban. 

Mr Zardari, writing in the New York Times, was reacting to criticism from American officials, including defence secretary Robert Gates and senior military chiefs.
They have publicly criticised Pakistan's failure to target al-Qaeda and Taliban leaders who use the country's tribal areas as a base to attack Nato troops in Afghanistan.
Mr Zardari said Pakistanis were suspicious because of America's support for Islamic militants during the war against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan and its support for military dictators such as General Zia and General Musharraf.
Despite Pakistan Army offensives against Taliban strongholds in Swat Valley and South Waziristan, American officials believe Islamabad is reluctant to target Taliban leaders like Mullah Omar and Jalaluddin Haqqani because they are long-standing allies.
His people also believed the United States favours its rival India and called for Washington to put pressure on New Delhi to open new talks on the future of Kashmir.
"Twice in recent history America abandoned its democratic values to support dictators and manipulate and exploit us," he said.
"In the 1980s, the United States supported Gen Muhammad Zia ul-Haq's iron rule against the Pakistani people while using Pakistan as a surrogate in the war against the Soviets in Afghanistan.
"That decade turned our peaceful nation into a 'Kalashnikov and heroin' society a nation defined by guns and drugs. In its fight against the Soviets, the US supported the most radical elements within the mujahedeen, who would later become the Taliban and al-Qaeda.
"When the Soviets were defeated and left in 1989, the US abandoned Pakistan and created a vacuum in Afghanistan, resulting in the current horror. And then after 9/11, the United States closed its eyes to the abuses of the dictatorship of President Musharraf. For Pakistanis, it is a bitter memory," he wrote.
He justified Pakistan's anxiety over its relations with India and warned there will be no peace in the region "without addressing Kashmir." Pakistan's best hope of defeating terrorism and fanaticism lies in developing its economy and strengthening its democracy, he said. ______  Dean Nelson, South Asia Editor , Dec 11, 2009

My Comments on article
Mr. Zardari Pakistan President  talk on the facts of 1989 that releave the weakness in US policies during that decade. During 1989 US leaves the Afghanistan after wining the Soviet war leave a great vacuum for a militant nation who serve a decade in war against a world power. Afghanistan that time loss every thing no economical values was present in country. Peoples of the Nation mostly youngsters  were disable due injuries in war or became  refuge in Pakistan, So, the source of economics and the pillar of nation, the youngsters were complete finished mentaly and physicaly. At that time of poverty some radicals stand in different tribes of Afghanistan and start against each other due to psychological claims. I think, these psychological claiming leads a militant nation to tribal war which were the drawbacks of US escaping without doing any development

If US army leaves Afghanistan or Iraq then same sititution  rise again in both countries... So, at this US army instead fighting make some development in both countries

 

Read more >>
Bookmark and Share

0 comments: